Kentucky Derby முடிவுகள்

Kentucky Derby-யில் வென்றவர் யார்?

House Democrats attack Trump’s $1.7bn compensation fund as ‘corruption unparalleled’ – US politics live

House Democrats attack Trump’s .7bn compensation fund as ‘corruption unparalleled’ – US politics live


‘Corruption unparalleled’: House Democrats slam deal as ‘slush fund’ that would give taxpayer dollars to Trump’s allies

Democrats have harshly criticized the settlement, saying it amounts to the creation of a “slush fund” for the president’s allies. Ninety-three congressional Democrats – including House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries – filed an amicus brief with the court on Monday saying that such a claim “raises the specter of corruption unparalleled in American history”.

In the brief, the lawmakers accuse the justice department of having “colluded” with Donald Trump and asking the judge to dismiss the case herself, arguing that the president is effectively “self-dealing” because he has a role on both sides of the litigation.

Never in the history of the United States has a sitting president sought a monetary settlement from the government he leads – let alone sought many billions of dollars in taxpayer funds,” their lawyers wrote.

“Should this lawsuit achieve Plaintiffs’ desired ends, it would result in the improper and unconstitutional transfer of taxpayer dollars into the pockets of the President, his family, and his allies.”

“Congress has not authorized any fund, much less one involving billions of taxpayer dollars, for these purposes,” they added.

In a press release, representative Jamie Raskin, the House judiciary committee’s ranking member, said:

double quotation markNo president can concoct a fake case for $10 billion in damages against the government so he can be plaintiff and defendant and then ‘settle’ his bogus case against himself as a judge.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

Reacting to the DoJ settlement and the creation of the so-called anti-weaponization fund, Stacey Young, executive director and founder of Justice Connection, issued this statement:

double quotation markThis case is a clear example of why Justice Department lawyers take an oath to serve the Constitution, not the White House. This department’s leadership is intent on abusing its power to curry favor with the President and execute his retribution campaign. The ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’ fits a pattern of corruption that is eroding DOJ’s integrity and Americans’ faith in the rule of law.

Share

Updated at 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *